Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of the excess GST paid on works contract services supplied to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, or whether any refund, if otherwise available, had to be claimed from the recipient entity and not from the tax department.
Analysis: The rate of tax on works contract services rendered to Government entities and authorities was increased to 18% by Notification No.22 of 2021-Central Tax (Rate) with effect from 01.01.2022. The later notification dated 13.07.2022 also governed the relevant category of services from 18.07.2022. The petitioner had paid tax at the enhanced rate for the relevant period and then sought refund of the alleged excess. The impugned refund claim was rejected on the footing that the housing board's internal resolution or communication did not create a statutory obligation on the respondent to sanction refund. The Court accepted that, if any amount was recoverable, the claim lay against the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, consistent with the principle reflected in Section 64A of the Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Conclusion: The refund claim against the respondent was not sustainable, and the petitioner was not entitled to refund from the tax department. Any further recovery, if permissible, was left to be pursued against the Tamil Nadu Housing Board.