Statutory Refund Entitlement: administrative IT constraints cannot deny refunds; respondents must process refunds with statutory interest.

Whether respondents must process and grant pending Fringe Benefit Tax refunds despite IT system limitations: the court applies the principle that administrative or technical difficulties cannot extinguish a statutory refund entitlement, and that statutory obligations to rectify, adjust and pay interest remain enforceable. The statutory scheme provides for interest on delayed refunds under the relevant provisions invoked, and rectification is the appropriate procedural remedy. Outcome: respondents directed to pass rectification orders, process the specified refunds and pay statutory interest within the timeframe ordered.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondents are obliged to process and grant the petitioner's pending refunds of Fringe Benefit Tax for Assessment Years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10, together with statutory interest, notwithstanding technical constraints in the Department's ITBA system, and whether relief by way of mandamus under Article 226 should be granted.

Analysis: The facts concerning filing of FBT returns, claims for refunds, rectification applications and follow-up correspondence are admitted and not disputed. The entitlement to the refunds and the denial of credited advance tax were not controverted on merits. The sole defence rests on technical limitations of the Department's ITBA system which prevented uploading or finalisation of rectification orders and refunds. A system created and maintained by the Department cannot lawfully be allowed to deprive a taxpayer of a statutory entitlement indefinitely. Administrative or technical difficulties do not extinguish the legal right to a refund or the statutory obligation to process rectification and grant interest as provided by the statute. The statutory framework provides for payment of interest on delayed refunds under Section 244A read with Section 115WL of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and for rectification and adjustment under the provisions invoked in the proceedings. Given the admitted entitlement and prolonged inaction, the appropriate remedy is to direct the respondents to rectify demands, process pending applications and grant the due refunds with statutory interest within a specified timeframe.

Conclusion: Relief granted in favour of the petitioner (assessee). The respondents are directed to process and grant the specified refunds for AY 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 along with interest under Section 244A read with Section 115WL of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and to pass necessary rectification orders within eight weeks from the date of the order.

---