Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be restricted to 25% of the duty amount when the duty had been paid before issuance of the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of Section 11AC and its provisos. The main provision attracts penalty where the statutory conditions exist, while the provisos operate to reduce the penalty where the duty is paid within the prescribed framework. On the facts, the duty amount had already been deposited before the show-cause notice. In such a situation, the assessee was held entitled to the benefit of the first and second provisos to Section 11AC, and the Tribunal's view sustaining penalty at 25% of the duty was approved.
Conclusion: The reduced penalty of 25% was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty liability is discharged before issuance of the show-cause notice, the assessee is entitled to the benefit of the provisos to Section 11AC and the penalty can be restricted in accordance with those provisos.