Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made by the Assessing Officer of unexplained cash deposits during the demonetization period can be sustained where the assessee has produced audited books of account, VAT returns, stock records and has shown the cash as recorded in cash book and offered to tax.
Analysis: The assessee is a partnership firm engaged in trading with audited books, VAT returns matching sales turnover and no discrepancies in stock quantification. Cash deposits during the relevant period were shown in the cash book and related to sale proceeds of jewellery. The Assessing Officer disallowed part of sales for certain days solely because bills lacked proper name and address and treated the residual as unexplained cash credit, applying provisions relating to unexplained cash and section 115BBE. The tribunal evaluated documentary evidence including audited accounts, VAT filings and stock sufficiency and found no material to conclude the sales were not genuine. The tribunal observed that treating sales already offered to tax as unexplained cash would amount to double taxation and that the assessee's explanation that deposits originated from cash-in-hand in books was supported by records.
Conclusion: Addition of unexplained cash deposits deleted and the assessee's explanation accepted; assessing officer directed to recompute income accordingly.