TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether surcharge and education cess could be levied over and above the 10% tax rate prescribed under the Indo-Swiss DTAA for royalty and fees for technical services. (ii) Whether receipts from supply of software licences were royalty or fees for technical services, or business profits not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Issue (i): Whether surcharge and education cess could be levied over and above the 10% tax rate prescribed under the Indo-Swiss DTAA for royalty and fees for technical services.
Analysis: The treaty rate was read with the DTAA provision defining Indian tax as income tax including surcharge thereon. On that basis, the 10% cap on tax for royalty and fees for technical services was held to include surcharge and, by the same treaty logic, education cess could not be added separately beyond the treaty ceiling.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether receipts from supply of software licences were royalty or fees for technical services, or business profits not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The software transactions were found to involve only limited licences for use of copyrighted software, without transfer of copyright or any right to exploit copyright. Applying the governing principles on computer software payments, such receipts were treated as consideration for use of software and not as royalty. As the assessee had no permanent establishment in India, the receipts were held not taxable in India as business profits.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed on both the treaty-rate issue and the software-royalty issue, and the additions made in assessment were not sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a treaty caps tax on royalty or fees for technical services at a specified rate and defines Indian tax as including surcharge, the treaty ceiling governs the total levy; and payments for limited software use under a non-exclusive licence, without transfer of copyright, are not royalty and do not create taxable income in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
TaxTMI 
