Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate order dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation could be sustained where the adjudication order and notice to show cause were not properly served on the petitioner but only uploaded on the authority's portal.
Analysis: It is not in dispute that the notice to show cause and the adjudication order were not served upon the petitioner by any mode except by uploading them on the portal under the "Additional Notices and Orders" tab. Where a party is not duly served and therefore lacks knowledge of the adjudication order, the period of limitation for filing an appeal does not commence. The Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of delay without addressing the failure of service and the consequent absence of knowledge. The petitioner approached the appellate authority immediately upon obtaining knowledge of the adjudication order. Given these facts, the technical delay is capable of being condoned and the appellate authority should have considered service and knowledge before dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds.
Conclusion: The appellate order dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay is set aside; the delay is condoned and the matter is remanded to the appellate authority for fresh consideration on merits. The decision is in favour of the assessee.