Reopening assessment invalid when reasons cite wrong year and AO lacks independent application of mind, order quashed.

Reopening an assessment under section 147/148 was held invalid where the reasons recorded referred to a different financial year than the year reopened and the Assessing Officer merely reproduced investigation material without independent application of mind. Applying the principle that reasons to believe must rest on tangible material and an AO's own concluded belief (not borrowed satisfaction), the Tribunal found the recorded reasons defective and the action amounted to a fishing inquiry; accordingly the reopening and resulting assessment order were quashed and the appeal allowed for the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reopening of assessment under section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid where the reasons recorded referred to incorrect financial year and the Assessing Officer acted on information from the investigation wing without independent application of mind.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer for reopening and noted that the information relied upon pertained to a different financial year than the assessment year reopened. The AO's reasons reproduced the investigation report and repeatedly misstated the relevant year; notices and the assessment order similarly reflected the same mistake. Applying established precedents requiring that reasons to believe be based on tangible material and an independent application of mind by the AO (not mere acceptance of investigation reports or 'borrowed satisfaction'), the Tribunal found that the recorded reasons did not demonstrate the requisite link between the material available to the AO and a concluded belief that income had escaped assessment. The Tribunal held that reopening based on such defective reasons and factual mistakes amounted to a nullity and constituted a fishing inquiry.

Conclusion: The reopening of assessment and the consequent assessment order are quashed and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---