Section 153C jurisdiction requires year-specific satisfaction and clear nexus; loose sheets alone cannot sustain additions.

Section 153C jurisdiction requires a proper, contemporaneous satisfaction note with a clear year-wise nexus between seized material and the alleged escapement of income; a consolidated or mechanical note covering multiple years is insufficient. Here, loose sheets recovered from a third party were not independently corroborated to show actual cash loans or repayments attributable to the assessee, so the reassessment initiation under section 153C was held invalid and the assessment orders unsustainable. Because jurisdiction itself failed, the merits of the additions under section 69A were not examined, and those additions were left open.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessments initiated under section 153C were valid in the absence of year-specific and material-specific satisfaction, and whether the additions under section 69A could survive.

Analysis: The notice under section 153C was founded on a consolidated satisfaction note covering multiple assessment years, without a separate year-wise linkage between the seized material and the alleged escapement of income. The seized papers were loose sheets recovered from a third party, and no independent corroborative evidence was brought on record to demonstrate actual cash loans or repayments attributable to the assessee. The jurisdictional requirement under section 153C demands a proper satisfaction, contemporaneous recording, and a clear nexus with the relevant assessment year; a blanket or mechanical satisfaction is insufficient. Since the jurisdiction itself failed, the merits of the additions under section 69A were not examined.

Conclusion: The assumption of jurisdiction under section 153C was invalid and the assessment orders were unsustainable. The Revenue's appeals were therefore dismissed, and the additions under section 69A were left open.

---