Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order framed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by an Assessing Officer who did not have jurisdiction (in the absence of any order under Section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 transferring the case) is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The assessee filed the return with the Central Circle-3(1) office and objected within five days to issuance of notice under Section 143(2) by ITO, Ward-43(2) on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and absence of any Section 127 transfer order. The assessing authority proceeded with assessment and passed order under Section 143(3) without disposing of the jurisdictional objection and without producing any Section 127 order; the revenue also failed to produce the transfer order when sought under the Right to Information Act. Judicial precedents dealing with identical factual matrices have held that assessment proceedings conducted by a non-jurisdictional officer, where no valid transfer under the statutory provision is shown, are without jurisdiction and must be quashed; those precedents were applied to the facts and records before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The assessment order dated 15.12.2017 framed under Section 143(3) by the non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer is without jurisdiction and is quashed; the appeal is allowed on this legal issue in favour of the assessee.