Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after approval of a resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, pending tax appeals against statutory dues can be continued before the Appellate Tribunal or must be treated as concluded/closed.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the NCLT order approving resolution plans under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and applied the Supreme Court's decision in Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. The analysis relied on the IBC provisions creating a moratorium under Section 14, the binding effect of an approved resolution plan under Section 31(1), and the overriding operation of the IBC under Section 238. The Tribunal noted that once a resolution plan is approved, claims not included in the plan stand extinguished and proceedings in respect of such claims cannot be initiated or continued. The Tribunal also considered that continuation of any pending appeal depends on whether the approved resolution plan expressly permits such continuation; absent such provision, the appellate authority becomes functus officio.
Conclusion: Against the appellant. The appeals cannot be continued and stand concluded/disposed of by operation of the approved resolution plan and the IBC.