Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal approves Resolution Plans for three companies, emphasizes compliance and creditor wisdom.</h1> The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plans submitted by UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited for three companies, emphasizing compliance with legal ... Seeking approval of Resolution Plan - Apparent contradictions in the Resolution Plan - Approvals from regulatory authorities - - application filed u/s 30(6) of the IBC seeking approval of this Adjudicating Authority u/s 31(1) of the IBC - HELD THAT:- Section 31(1) ibid mandates that the Adjudicating Authority shall by order approve the resolution plan if it is satisfied that such resolution plan as approved by the CoC under sub-section (4) of section 30 meets the requirements as referred to in sub-section (2) of section 30. From the perusal of the plan the Resolution Applicant is planning to monetise most of the assets and will continue only with a small portion of the business operations as stated above. Therefore, the Resolution Plan is not in accordance with the provisions of Income Tax Act and the existing benefits envisaged thereunder may not be available. The plan also gives commercial logic for issuing 24% of equity to Financial Creditor as passing on the value garnered by the companies during continuous operations of five years. However, we are afraid that the Resolution Applicant may generate very negligible amount from actual business operations for three years as stated above. Therefore, this logic also appears to be flawed. Apparent contradictions in the Resolution Plan - HELD THAT:- The plan does not appear to a Resolution plan but appears to be a winding up, liquidation plan while just retaining a small portion of the business operations of the corporate applicants. In K. Sashidhar v Indian Overseas Bank & others, [2019 (2) TMI 1043 - SUPREME COURT], decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court examined the situations arising in terms of section 31 of the IBC and held that the legislature has not endowed the adjudicating authority (NCLT) with the jurisdiction or authority to analyse or evaluate the commercial decision of CoC. Approvals from regulatory authorities - HELD THAT:- Since the corporate applicants are licencees of spectrum by DoT, approval of DoT for Spectrum Transaction and AL Fibre and Business Transactions, and activities ancillary thereto or required therefor, will also be taken by the corporate applicants acting through the Monitoring Committee after the Resolution Plans are approved by this Adjudicating Authority. The Resolution Plans placed on record in respect of all the three corporate applicants, viz., (1) Aircel Limited; (2) Dishnet Wireless Limited; and (3) Aircel Cellular Limited, is hereby approved with the few modifications - moratorium shall cease to have effect. Application allowed. Issues Involved:1. Approval of the Resolution Plans under section 30(6) read with section 31(1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC).2. Compliance with the requirements under section 30(2) of the IBC.3. Evaluation of the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors (CoC).4. Reliefs, concessions, and dispensations sought by the Resolution Applicant.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Approval of the Resolution Plans:The Resolution Professional (RP) filed three Interlocutory Applications (IAs) seeking approval of the Resolution Plans submitted by UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (UVARC) for Aircel Limited, Dishnet Wireless Limited, and Aircel Cellular Limited. The Tribunal acknowledged the substantial interweave of businesses among these companies and decided to dispose of all three IAs through a single order.2. Compliance with the Requirements under Section 30(2) of the IBC:The Tribunal examined whether the Resolution Plans met the requirements of section 30(2) of the IBC:- CIRP Costs: The Resolution Plans provided for the payment of insolvency resolution process costs in priority to other debts.- Operational Creditors: The Plans earmarked specific amounts for employees and operational creditors, ensuring that they would receive at least the liquidation value.- Management and Implementation: The Plans included provisions for the management of the corporate debtors post-approval and detailed steps for the implementation and supervision of the Resolution Plans.- Legal Compliance: The Plans did not contravene any provisions of the law.3. Evaluation of the Commercial Wisdom of the CoC:The Tribunal acknowledged the commercial wisdom of the CoC, which approved the Resolution Plans by a margin of 73.88%, more than the statutory minimum of 66%. The CoC's decision was based on the feasibility and viability of the Plans, considering the interconnected nature of the businesses and the potential for asset monetization. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court judgments in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank and Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta, which emphasized the non-justiciability of the CoC’s commercial decisions.4. Reliefs, Concessions, and Dispensations Sought by the Resolution Applicant:The Resolution Applicant sought various reliefs, including exemptions from certain legal compliances, waivers of penalties, and continuation of business permits. The Tribunal granted several of these requests, particularly those related to tax benefits, stamp duty exemptions, and the continuation of business permits. However, it denied blanket approvals for waivers of non-compliances and emphasized the need for the Resolution Applicant to comply with legal requirements post-approval.Conclusion:The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plans with specific modifications, emphasizing the importance of compliance with legal requirements and the commercial wisdom of the CoC. The approval was binding on all stakeholders, and the moratorium imposed under section 14 of the IBC ceased to have effect from the date of the order. The RP was directed to forward all records to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and file a copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, Mumbai.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found