Post-mining coal transport is GTA service, not mining service, and the tax demand with interest and penalty fails.

Post-mining transportation of crushed coal under work orders for hauling tippers was held to be Goods Transport Agency service, not "Mining of mineral, oil or gas service", because the ordinary meaning of mining covers extraction and allied mining operations rather than transport after extraction. The phrase "in relation to" could not be stretched to cover every activity within a mining area, and the actual nature of the work controlled classification. As the recipient had already treated the service as transportation under the GTA category and the relevant circular supported that view, the demand of service tax, interest and penalty was unsustainable and was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant's activity of hiring tippers/pay orders for transportation of crushed coal was classifiable under "Mining of mineral, oil or gas service" or under "Goods Transport Agency" service, and whether the consequent demand of service tax, interest, and penalty was sustainable.

Analysis: The activity undertaken under the work orders was transportation of coal to specified destinations. The expression "in relation to" in the definition of mining service could not be expanded to cover every activity carried out within a mining area. The term "mining", though not defined in the Finance Act, was understood in its ordinary sense as extraction of minerals and allied processes connected with mining operations, not post-mining transportation. The service had already been treated as transportation service by the recipient, who had discharged service tax as the service recipient under the GTA category. The circular relied upon also indicated that transportation of coal/mineral from pit head to a specified location, or outside the mine, fell within the relevant transportation-related taxable services.

Conclusion: The activity was correctly classifiable as Goods Transport Agency service and not as mining service. The demand of service tax, along with interest and penalty, was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned demand was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief as permissible in law.

Ratio Decidendi: Post-mining transportation of coal does not fall within mining service merely because the definition uses the phrase "in relation to"; the actual nature of the work must govern classification, and transportation service cannot be reclassified as mining service absent a direct nexus with extraction or mining operations.

---