Freight charges on freight-to-pay consignments not added to manufacturer's assessable value where no flow-back to manufacturer.

Freight paid by buyers on "freight to pay" consignments is not includible in the manufacturer's assessable value where it is shown that the freight did not flow back to or benefit the manufacturer. The valuation analysis applied the place of removal framework and the benefit/flow back test under the valuation rules, and followed prior final orders on identical facts. Consequence: differential duty demands that add such buyer paid freight to assessable value are set aside and the appeal is allowed where no evidence of benefit or receipt by the manufacturer exists.

---

---

Issues: Whether freight charges realized (or purportedly realized) at the consignment agent's depot and paid by buyers on "freight to pay" consignments are includible in the assessable value for central excise duty under the valuation provisions (Rule 5 / Rule 7 and section 4 context) for the periods covered by the impugned show cause notices.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined Rule 7 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 and the valuation regime tied to the "place of removal" under Section 4. It applied the test whether freight paid by buyers had in fact benefited or flowed back to the manufacturer; if no flow-back or benefit to the manufacturer is shown, the freight element is not to be added to the manufacturer's assessable value. The Tribunal relied on a series of its earlier final orders in the appellant's own case on identical facts and the settled position in earlier Tribunal decisions holding that where goods are consigned on "freight to pay" basis and freight is directly paid by buyer to the transporter with no evidence of benefit to the manufacturer, freight is not includible. The Tribunal also applied judicial discipline (stare decisis) in following its prior final orders in the appellant's favour for the same issue and periods.

Conclusion: The appeal is allowed and the impugned order demanding differential duty by including freight in assessable value is set aside; freight realized/paid by buyers on "freight to pay" consignments is not includible in the manufacturer's assessable value where no flow-back to the manufacturer is proved (decision in favour of the assessee).

---