Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight realized from buyers at the consignment agent's depot was includible in the assessable value of the goods cleared to the consignment agent.
Analysis: The goods were admittedly cleared to the consignment agent at a different place, and the dispute was confined to inclusion of freight in valuation. The record did not show that the freight paid by the buyer to the transporter had in any manner flowed back to or benefited the manufacturer. In the absence of proof of any flow back or disguised receipt by the manufacturer, the declared assessable value could not be altered merely because the sales were on a freight-to-pay basis.
Conclusion: Freight was not includible in the assessable value and the valuation adopted by the appellant was upheld.