Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 81,06,000 under section 56(2)(vii)(b) could be validly made without considering the valuation report of the District Valuation Officer after a statutory reference under section 142A, and whether the assessment and the CIT(A) order should be set aside and the matter restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The Assessing Officer made a reference to the District Valuation Officer under section 142A before completing the assessment, and no valuation report was received prior to the assessment order. Explanation 1(iv) to section 153 requires exclusion of the period from the date of reference to the Valuation Officer until receipt of his report for computation of limitation. Section 142A(6) contemplates that the Valuation Officer shall send his report to the Assessing Officer and the assessee within the prescribed period. Given the statutory scheme, the valuation report is integral to deciding the issue of valuation for invoking section 56(2)(vii)(b), and the assessment cannot be finally adjudicated without considering that report.
Conclusion: The assessment addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) and the appellate order confirming it are set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after considering the valuation report of the District Valuation Officer and after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.