Limitation and condonation of delay: appeal dismissed where statutory 30 day cap barred any condoning and relief.

Limitation and condonation of delay is treated as a substantive bar: the statutory maximum thirty-day period for condoning delay cannot be exceeded, and authorities lack power to condone beyond that cap; the appeal against an appellate order that refused relief as time-barred was therefore disallowed on limitation grounds. The tribunal applied the settled principle from higher-court precedent that no forum may exercise condonation powers beyond what the statute permits, and dismissed the appeal for being beyond the statutory condonation period.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal is barred by limitation and therefore beyond the condoning power of the Commissioner (Appeals), where the delay exceeds the maximum statutory period of 30 days.

Analysis: The appeal challenges an order of the Commissioner (Appeals) which disallowed condonation of delay on the ground that the delay exceeded the maximum statutory period permitted for condonation. The Tribunal notes that statutory limits on condonation are binding and that no authority may exercise condoning power beyond what the statute permits. The decision in Singh Enterprises v. CCE (as relied upon by the respondent) is treated as authoritative for the proposition that condoning power cannot exceed the statutory provision, and this principle has been followed by this Bench in prior decisions.

Conclusion: The appeal is barred by limitation and is beyond the condoning power of the Commissioner (Appeals); the appeal is therefore dismissed.

---