Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 50C by adopting a higher value from departmental information is sustainable where the Sub-Registrar's Calculation Statement shows a value equal to the registered sale consideration and stamp duty was paid on that registered value.
Analysis: Section 50C permits adoption of the value shown in prescribed authorities' records as full value of consideration for transfer of immovable property. The Assessing Officer relied on departmental information indicating a higher value, but the Sub-Registrar's Calculation Statement correctly recorded the property value as equal to the registered sale consideration. Stamp duty was paid on the registered consideration, and there was a noted typographical error in the departmental information which led to an inflated figure being used. The Sub-Registrar's valuation document and evidence of stamp duty payment demonstrate that the registered sale consideration was not less than the jantri value and accurately reflects the transaction value.
Conclusion: The adoption of the higher departmental figure is not sustainable where the Sub-Registrar's valuation equals the registered sale consideration and stamp duty has been paid on that amount; the addition under Section 50C is therefore unwarranted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.