Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on tower materials, PSC poles and AAA conductors used for providing cellular telephone services.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether the subject goods (tower materials, PSC poles and AAA conductors) qualify as inputs or capital goods for the purpose of availing Cenvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, including whether towers and their components are excisable goods and whether there is requisite nexus with the output service. The Tribunal relied on an earlier decision of the Tribunal in the same matter which held that towers and their parts were treated as excisable goods and that installed towers and their components are essential for providing the telecommunication service; accordingly such goods satisfy the definition of 'input' under Rule 2(k). The Tribunal also considered the limitation contention and noted that the revenue had itself accepted duty payment on towers, which supported the availability of credit on inputs used in manufacture of those excisable goods.
Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on the subject goods and set aside the impugned demand; the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any.