Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 63 of the GST Act and the appellate order under Section 107 can be sustained where an ex-parte assessment was made against an unregistered person due to reliance on portal data and mistaken identity with a registered person, without affording opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The assessment proceeded on the basis of a temporary GSTIN and data retrieved from WAMIS and other portals which linked turnover entries to the petitioner. The authorities treated the petitioner as unregistered and passed an ex-parte assessment without effective participation by the petitioner. Subsequent clarification from the Superintending Engineer established that the transactional returns related to a different person who is registered under GST and shares an identical name. The authorities conceded that confusion arose from identical names and reliance on uploaded portal data. In these circumstances the assessment and appellate orders rest on a factual mistake and were rendered without affording the petitioner an opportunity to explain or produce clarifying information.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order dated 12.11.2021 under Section 63 and the appellate order dated 16.02.2024 under Section 107 cannot be sustained and are quashed and set aside; the writ petition is allowed in favour of the assessee.