Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the process of converting wet blue leather into finished leather amounts to manufacture for the purpose of concessional tax under Section 3(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The conversion of wet blue leather into finished leather involves multiple successive processes, including splitting, shaving, washing, rechroming, neutralisation, retanning, dyeing, drying, staking, trimming, buffing, dedusting and finishing. Applying the settled test of manufacture, the decisive question is whether the end product is commercially different from the input and is recognised in the trade as a new and distinct commodity. The material on record showed that finished leather is not the same commodity as wet blue leather, that each stage materially changes the article, and that the final product has a distinct identity, name and use in the market. The tariff entry describing both as dressed hides and skins does not answer the separate question whether manufacture has occurred.
Conclusion: The conversion of wet blue leather into finished leather amounts to manufacture, and the assessee was entitled to claim the concession.
Ratio Decidendi: Manufacture takes place when a series of processes bring into existence a commercially distinct and newly recognised commodity, even if the goods continue to fall within a broad tariff description.