Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (beyond three years) is valid in the absence of escapement of income exceeding Rs.50 lakhs, and consequently whether assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 is valid.
Analysis: The issue concerns the effect of the amended limitation regime for issuance of notices beyond the three-year period. The factual quantification of escaped income for the assessment years was Rs.4,10,200 and Rs.3,17,776 respectively, both below the Rs.50 lakh threshold. Under the amended provision governing notices issued after the three-year period, a notice under Section 148 can be issued only where the income escaping assessment exceeds the prescribed threshold. The validity of the reassessment proceedings therefore turns on whether the statutory threshold for issuance of a Section 148 notice beyond three years is met.
Conclusion: The notice under Section 148 issued beyond the three-year period is invalid because the escapement of income does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs; the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 is therefore flawed and the reassessment proceedings are quashed. The result is in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notice under Section 148 is issued after the three-year period, the notice is valid only if the income escaping assessment exceeds the statutory threshold in Section 149(1)(b); failure to meet that threshold renders the reassessment proceedings invalid.