Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 5,63,204 made under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as unexplained cash deposits in the bank during AprilMay 2016 was justified.
Analysis: The assessee produced a month-wise cash book and regular books of account showing cash receipts, cash withdrawals and bank deposits; these books were audited and were not rejected by applying Section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The cash book did not show any negative cash balance on any day and recorded receipts from debtors claimed to have been realized in AprilMay 2016. The assessing officer did not produce independent evidence disputing the cash book entries or identifying the sundry debtors from whom payments were allegedly received; the only basis for the addition was a comparison with closing debtor balances in the preceding return year. Given that the source of deposits was traceable to the regular books of account which were accepted and not rejected under Section 145(3), the statutory requirement for treating bank deposits as unexplained under Section 69A was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 5,63,204 under Section 69A is deleted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where cash deposits are supported by a regularly maintained cash book and books of account which have not been rejected under Section 145(3), such deposits cannot be treated as unexplained for the purposes of Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.