Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (1) TMI 611 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Transfer pricing adjustments for calculational errors and ECB foreign exchange loss treated as non-operating, appeal allowed. Transfer pricing adjustment: a calculational error in computing comparable companies' margins required the assessing and transfer pricing officers to ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Transfer pricing adjustments for calculational errors and ECB foreign exchange loss treated as non-operating, appeal allowed.

                              Transfer pricing adjustment: a calculational error in computing comparable companies' margins required the assessing and transfer pricing officers to consider the assessee's margin working chart, provide detailed margin computations and afford hearing, resulting in partial allowance of the statistical adjustment. Treatment of foreign exchange on ECBs: loss on foreign exchange translations was held to be capital/non-operating in nature consistent with prior year treatment and therefore must be excluded from operating profit margin for the manufacturing segment, resulting in allowance of the assessee's position.




                              1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

                              (i) Whether the transfer pricing determination suffered from a calculational/working error in computing margins of comparable companies, warranting a direction to the tax authority to rework and provide the detailed margin computation after considering the assessee's chart and after granting hearing.

                              (ii) Whether loss on foreign exchange translation relating to External Commercial Borrowing (ECB), asserted to be a capital account item, ought to be treated as non-operating (and not operating) for computing the operating profit margin of the manufacturing segment, particularly in light of consistent treatment of the same ECB translation gains/losses in earlier years.

                              2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                              Issue (i): Reworking of comparable margins due to alleged calculation error

                              Legal framework (as discussed): The Tribunal proceeded on the footing that the arm's length analysis must be supported by a discernible and verifiable computation of comparable margins, and that the assessee must be afforded an opportunity of being heard where working details are not provided.

                              Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal accepted the assessee's specific grievance that the comparable margins reflected in the orders were allegedly the result of a calculation error and that the working/basis for such margins was not furnished. The assessee had placed a chart on record comparing margins across the transfer pricing order, the order giving effect to directions, the rectification application figures, and the rectified order. Given the nature of the grievance as a working/computation issue and the availability of the assessee's compiled workings, the Tribunal held that the matter required re-examination at the level of the tax authority with a speaking computation.

                              Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the tax authority to consider the assessee's working chart and provide the detailed margin calculation/working after granting opportunity of hearing. The ground was partly allowed for statistical purposes (i.e., restored for limited recomputation/verification).

                              Issue (ii): Operating vs non-operating character of ECB foreign exchange translation loss; application of consistency

                              Legal framework (as discussed): The Tribunal examined the classification of forex translation impact for purposes of computing operating margins in transfer pricing and applied the principle of consistency where the same underlying transaction (the same ECB) had been treated in a particular manner in prior transfer pricing proceedings.

                              Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal found that, although the assessee had excluded the ECB translation loss from operating cost in its study, the tax authority recomputed operating margin by treating "net loss on foreign currency transactions and translations" as operating, including the ECB translation loss. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's position that the ECB translation loss arose on translation of a balance-sheet borrowing and was in the nature of a capital account item. A decisive factor was that, for the same continuing ECB, prior proceedings had accepted translation loss as non-operating expense, and even translation gain on the same ECB had been treated as non-operating income. The Tribunal held that the authorities below failed to consider this continuity and should have maintained consistent treatment for the same loan across years.

                              Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the ECB foreign exchange translation loss should be treated as non-operating for computing operating profit margin of the manufacturing segment for the year in question, and allowed the ground.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found