Indian airline customer payments to Netherlands resident-whether "royalty" under DTAA Article 12-held not taxable in India.

The dominant issue was whether amounts received by a Netherlands tax resident from Indian airline customers constituted "royalty" taxable in India under s.9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-Netherlands DTAA. The tribunal held that royalty under the DTAA required granting use or a right to use intellectual property or providing a secret process/formula to the Indian customers; on facts, no such rights or secret process were made available. It further held that expanded domestic-law definitions of royalty cannot be automatically imported into the DTAA, following HC precedent. Consequently, the receipts were not royalty under Article 12(4) and were not taxable in India, and the taxpayer was justified in not offering them to tax.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

(i) Whether the amounts received from Indian airlines for access to and use of the assessee's hosted airline solutions/system constitute "royalties" within the meaning of Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA and are therefore taxable in India.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue (i): Characterisation as "royalties" under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA

Legal framework (as discussed by the Tribunal): The Tribunal examined the treaty definition in Article 12(4), which confines "royalties" to consideration for the use of, or right to use, specified intellectual property (including a secret formula or process) or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience.

Interpretation and reasoning: On the contractual terms, the customer airlines were granted only a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and use the system for internal airline operations, with the system being hosted on servers outside India. The agreements emphasised retention of intellectual property with the provider and imposed restrictions preventing copying, sublicensing, reverse engineering, or otherwise exploiting the system beyond permitted access. The Tribunal treated these features as negating any positive conferral of "use" or "right to use" of intellectual property in the sense required by Article 12(4), because the customers obtained no effective control or dominion over the underlying process/technology; they merely derived a benefit from services delivered through infrastructure controlled and operated by the provider.

The Tribunal further held that the "secret formula or process" limb was not satisfied on facts because no secret process/formula was provided or made available to customers; only access to a hosted system was provided. It also rejected characterisation under the third limb ("information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience"), reasoning that the arrangement involved processing and providing outputs through the system rather than imparting the provider's own experience/technique/methodology or transferring knowledge or know-how to the customers.

Conclusions: The Tribunal conclusively held that the receipts from Indian airline customers do not constitute "royalties" under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA, and therefore were not taxable in India on that basis; the assessee was justified in not offering them to tax in India under the treaty definition of royalty.

---