Invalid sanction for Section 148 notice led to reopening and consequential assessment being quashed

Undated approval and a satisfaction note evidenced only by a seal were held insufficient to show conscious application of mind for sanctioning notice under Section 148. Because the approval form served on the assessee also bore only the seal without the Principal Commissioner's signature, the recorded satisfaction was treated as invalid. The reopening consequently failed, and the assessment made pursuant to it was quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the approval for issuing notice under Section 148 was valid, and whether the reopening and consequential assessment could survive.

Analysis: The approval recorded by the Principal Commissioner was undated, and the satisfaction note was reflected by the mere affixation of a seal. The approval form served on the assessee also showed the seal without the signature of the Principal Commissioner. On these facts, the recorded satisfaction was held to be invalid, as the material did not any conscious application of mind for sanctioning the notice.

Conclusion: The approval for issuance of notice under Section 148 was invalid, the reopening was invalid, and the consequential assessment was quashed.

---