Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (12) TMI 1526 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Amalgamation-driven s.170A modified return after completed assessment: dispute over fresh 143(2)/142(1) notices; actions temporarily restrained After a modified return was filed under s.170A to give effect to an amalgamation scheme, the AO had already completed assessment for the relevant AY by an ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Amalgamation-driven s.170A modified return after completed assessment: dispute over fresh 143(2)/142(1) notices; actions temporarily restrained

                              After a modified return was filed under s.170A to give effect to an amalgamation scheme, the AO had already completed assessment for the relevant AY by an order dated 26.03.2025, with supporting particulars (including loss and unabsorbed depreciation) having been disclosed in the tax audit material. The dominant issue was whether the AO could thereafter issue fresh notices under ss.143(2) and 142(1) for the same AY to reassess income on the basis of the s.170A modified return. The HC held that a strong prima facie case existed against such fresh initiation and that balance of convenience favoured the assessee; consequently, it granted ad-interim restraint against all steps pursuant to the impugned notices, including passing any assessment order.




                              1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

                              (i) Whether, after an assessment order for the relevant assessment year has been passed upon considering the modified return filed under Section 170A (pursuant to an NCLT-approved amalgamation), the Assessing Officer becomes functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to issue a fresh notice under Section 143(2) and a consequential notice under Section 142(1) for the same assessment year on the basis of the same modified return.

                              (ii) Whether, pending final disposal of the writ petition, the impugned notices should be stayed by granting ad-interim injunctive relief, applying the tests of prima facie case and balance of convenience.

                              2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                              Issue (i): Jurisdiction to issue fresh Section 143(2)/142(1) notices after completion of assessment considering the modified return under Section 170A

                              Legal framework (as discussed by the Court): The Court considered the operation of Section 170A(2), namely that where assessment proceedings are pending on the date of furnishing a modified return consequent to an NCLT order, the Assessing Officer is to pass an order assessing/reassessing total income in accordance with the NCLT order and taking into account the modified return.

                              Interpretation and reasoning: The Court examined the record of the concluded assessment proceedings and noted that during those proceedings a detailed notice under Section 142(1) raised specific queries concerning the amalgamation and the resultant reduction of taxable income. The assessee furnished a comparative computation of original and revised/modified income and provided supporting details relating to losses and depreciation of the amalgamating entity. The Court treated these circumstances-followed by the assessment order dated 26 March 2025-as indicating that the amalgamation-related impact reflected in the modified return had already been put to scrutiny and formed part of the completed assessment exercise.

                              Conclusions (for interim stage): On these facts, the Court held that prima facie there was substance in the contention that, once assessment was completed after considering the modified return aspects, the Assessing Officer could not issue a fresh notice under Section 143(2) for the same year to reassess income on the basis of that very modified return, supporting the plea of want of jurisdiction/functus officio for purposes of interim protection.

                              Issue (ii): Grant of ad-interim restraint against steps pursuant to impugned notices

                              Legal framework (as applied by the Court): The Court applied the standard interim-relief considerations of (a) existence of a strong prima facie case and (b) balance of convenience.

                              Interpretation and reasoning: Given that the earlier assessment proceedings had specifically queried the amalgamation impact and the assessee's responses were on record before the assessment order was passed, the Court found "considerable force" in the challenge to the subsequent notices. It further found that the balance of convenience favoured the assessee in preventing further coercive or duplicative assessment steps during pendency of the challenge.

                              Conclusions: The Court granted ad-interim relief restraining the revenue authorities from taking any steps pursuant to the impugned notices, including passing any assessment order based on those notices, pending hearing and final disposal of the petition.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found