Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. dated 26-06-2001 in respect of the disputed clearances, and whether duty and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The disputed invoices were shown to relate to goods sent under ARE-3 to exporters who had filed the requisite Annexure-I applications before the jurisdictional Central Excise officer. The invoices raised on the job-worker's principal were only for realisation of conversion charges. On the record, the goods were found to have been cleared for export-related use in the manner contemplated by the notification, and the Revenue's objection of procedural lapse was not accepted.
Conclusion: The conditions of Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. dated 26-06-2001 were held to be satisfied, and the assessee was held entitled to the exemption benefit. The confirmation of duty and imposition of penalty were set aside, and the appeal succeeded.