Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication because the assessee could not participate in the faceless proceedings and was denied an effective opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The appeal arose from dismissal of the assessee's case for non-prosecution. The record reflected that notices were issued through the faceless mechanism and uploaded on the departmental portal, but the assessee had not effectively responded and claimed lack of awareness of the proceedings. In the circumstances, and with no objection from the Revenue, the Tribunal found that one more opportunity should be afforded in the interest of justice. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration with a direction to grant reasonable opportunity of hearing and to proceed afresh.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee, and the grounds were allowed for statistical purposes.