Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the contract for supply, installation and commissioning was a composite indivisible works contract, and whether the goods brought from outside the State and used in execution of that contract were entitled to deduction under the relevant trade tax provision.
Analysis: The contract was read as a whole and its substance showed an integrated arrangement for designing, manufacturing, inspection, testing, supply, installation and commissioning. The use of the word supply did not alter the essential character of the agreement, since supply of machinery was only an integral part of the overall works contract. The goods were brought from outside the State of Uttar Pradesh and consumed in execution of the works, which attracted the benefit contemplated by the statutory provision relied upon by the revisionist.
Conclusion: The contract was a composite indivisible works contract, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of deduction under Section 3F(2)(b) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act.
Ratio Decidendi: For tax purposes, the true nature of a contract must be determined from the agreement as a whole, and where goods are imported from outside the State and consumed in execution of an indivisible works contract, the statutory deduction or exemption applicable to such works contracts cannot be denied merely because the agreement uses the word supply.