Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte assessment order, as modified by rectification, required interference so that the petitioner could file a fresh reply and seek appropriate relief, including consideration of the remedy under Section 128A.
Analysis: The assessment was passed without a response from the petitioner to the show cause notice. The petitioner stated that the tax liability had been discharged and sought liberty to place a reply to the notice so that the matter could be decided on merits. The Court accepted that a further opportunity should be given and directed the petitioner to file a reply within 30 days, after which the respondent was to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. Liberty was also reserved to work out the remedy under Section 128A if available.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted an opportunity to contest the assessment afresh, and the matter was sent back for consideration on merits; the request for interference was therefore accepted to that extent.