Failure to explain cash deposits justified remand for de novo assessment with full supporting evidence.

The assessee had failed to furnish cogent evidence before the AO and the appellate authority to explain the source and nature of cash deposits and receipts. As supporting bank statements, documents and explanations were not produced, the Tribunal found it appropriate in the interests of justice to restore the matter for fresh verification. The appellate order was set aside and the case was remanded to the AO for a de novo assessment, with directions that the assessee cooperate and submit the required material.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessment and appellate order deserved to be set aside and the matter restored for fresh consideration in view of the assessee's failure to furnish supporting evidence for the cash deposits and receipts.

Analysis: The assessee had not furnished cogent evidence before the Assessing Officer or the appellate authority to explain the source and nature of the substantial receipts. At the hearing before the Tribunal, the assessee sought an to produce the relevant bank statements, documents, and explanations. In the interests of justice, the matter was considered fit to be reopened at the assessment stage for proper verification.

Outcome: The appellate order was set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment with directions for the assessee to cooperate and furnish the required material.

---