Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (11) TMI 1249 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessments under sections 153A and 153C annulled due to invalid section 153D approval; proceedings held jurisdictionally void ITAT Delhi (AT) allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the assessments framed under s.153A r.w.s. 153C on the ground of invalid approval under s.153D. ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessments under sections 153A and 153C annulled due to invalid section 153D approval; proceedings held jurisdictionally void

                            ITAT Delhi (AT) allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the assessments framed under s.153A r.w.s. 153C on the ground of invalid approval under s.153D. The Bench held that the approval granted by the Addl. CIT, Central Range, Gurugram, did not satisfy the statutory requirement of a valid and proper sanction, following the ratio of earlier decisions in Millenium Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. and a Delhi HC ruling in Shiv Kumar Nayyar. As the defect in s.153D approval went to the root of jurisdiction, the entire proceedings were declared void and the assessments annulled.




                            ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

                            1. Whether an approval granted under section 153D of the Income-tax Act that is common/composite for multiple assessment years and granted in a mechanical manner without independent application of mind is valid.

                            2. Whether an assessment order framed under section 153A (read with section 153C) is vitiated where the prior approval required by section 153D is invalid.

                            3. Whether, in light of an invalid approval under section 153D, the Tribunal should adjudicate merits of additions (alleged suppression of professional receipts, unexplained credits under section 68, and recharacterisation of declared salary as unexplained income) or leave those grounds open.

                            ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Issue 1 - Validity of approval under section 153D where approval is common/composite and mechanically granted

                            Legal framework: Section 153D requires prior approval of a specified higher authority before an Assessing Officer below the rank of Joint Commissioner may make an assessment or reassessment under section 153A/153B; the approval must pertain to each assessment year referred to in the relevant provisions.

                            Precedent Treatment: The Tribunal relied on coordinate Bench decisions and jurisdictional High Court authority finding that approvals given without application of mind or as a mechanical rubber-stamp are invalid. Decisions cited include a coordinate Bench decision (Millenium Vinimay), the jurisdictional High Court (PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar), and earlier authority approving invalidation of perfunctory approvals (Shreelekha Damani and related authorities). A Supreme Court-track order dismissing SLP in a similar context (Serajuddin and Co.) was noted.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: The approval impugned was a single, composite approval for multiple assessment years rather than discrete approvals for each year. The approving authority granted approval for many cases on the same day and did not record per-year, case-specific consideration. The language of the approval and surrounding facts indicated that the approval was accorded without examination of the draft orders or independent application of mind (mechanical/routine exercise). The statute contemplates a considered approval for each assessment year; mechanical/blanket approvals defeat the statutory purpose.

                            Ratio vs. Obiter: Ratio - Approval under section 153D must reflect independent application of mind and must be specific to each assessment year; a composite/mechanical approval is invalid. Obiter - Observations on administrative convenience and the general irrelevance of internal procedures to the assessee were addressed but not adopted as overriding propositions.

                            Conclusion: The composite/common approval was invalid for want of application of mind and for failing to approve each assessment year separately as required; therefore the approval did not satisfy section 153D.

                            Issue 2 - Effect of invalid section 153D approval on assessments framed under section 153A/153C

                            Legal framework: Statutory scheme prohibits an Assessing Officer below the specified rank from making an assessment under section 153A/153C without prior valid approval under section 153D; compliance with approval requirement is jurisdictional.

                            Precedent Treatment: Tribunal and High Court authorities cited hold that an assessment made in absence of a valid section 153D approval is vitiated, non-est and a nullity; when approval is found to be a mere mechanical formality, assessment must be quashed.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: Given the invalidity of the approval (Issue 1), the assessments framed under section 153A read with section 153C lack the mandatory statutory sanction and are therefore vitiated. The approval is a precondition to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction; absence or invalidity of that precondition nullifies consequent assessment action. Because the impugned approval was common/mechanical and did not comply with statutory mandate, the entire proceedings initiated under the search/assessment provisions are liable to be quashed.

                            Ratio vs. Obiter: Ratio - An assessment framed under section 153A/153C without a valid section 153D approval is invalid; the invalidity of approval goes to jurisdiction and vitiates the assessment. Obiter - Procedural or administrative defenses that the approval process is irrelevant to the assessee were rejected on the facts but not elevated beyond those facts.

                            Conclusion: The assessments framed under section 153A r.w.s. 153C were quashed for want of a valid section 153D approval.

                            Issue 3 - Adjudication of substantive additions where the approval under section 153D is invalid

                            Legal framework: Substantive additions (e.g., suppression of receipts, unexplained credits under section 68, recharacterisation of salary) are ordinarily adjudicated on merits; however, jurisdictional defects may preclude merits adjudication.

                            Precedent Treatment: Coordinate decisions and the Tribunal's reasoning recognize that where a fundamental jurisdictional defect exists (invalid sanction/approval), it is permissible and appropriate to quash proceedings without examining merits of additions; similar approach adopted in cited authorities.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: Because the Tribunal concluded that the approval under section 153D was invalid and that assessments were therefore vitiated, it considered it unnecessary to adjudicate the substantive grounds relating to additions. The Tribunal expressly refrained from deciding the merits of additions and left those grounds open for adjudication if required following valid proceedings.

                            Ratio vs. Obiter: Ratio - Where an assessment is quashed for want of a valid statutory approval that goes to jurisdiction, merits of additions need not be examined and may be left open. Obiter - Comments noting that other grounds became infructuous given the invalid approval are contextual to the present disposition.

                            Conclusion: The Tribunal did not adjudicate the substantive additions (suppression of professional receipts, section 68 unexplained credit, recharacterisation of salary) and kept those grounds open, because the assessments were quashed for invalid approval under section 153D.

                            Relief and Disposition

                            The Tribunal quashed the assessment proceedings initiated under section 153A read with section 153C for the assessment years before it for want of a valid section 153D approval, applying the same reasoning mutatis mutandis to the connected assessment years; other grounds of appeal were left open for future adjudication if relevant after curative compliance with statutory approval requirements.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found