Discretionary review under Article 136 declined; special leave petition against Commissioner of Customs dismissed with no relief SC refused to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and dismissed the special leave petition filed by the petitioner against the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Discretionary review under Article 136 declined; special leave petition against Commissioner of Customs dismissed with no relief
SC refused to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and dismissed the special leave petition filed by the petitioner against the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive). The Court recorded hearing of petitioner's counsel, found no merit for interference, dismissed the petition and disposed of all pending applications. The matter is concluded without relief to the petitioner.
The Court considered the petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and held that "we are not satisfied that it is a fit case to exercise our discretion under Article 136 of the Constitution of India." Accordingly, the petition is dismissed and all pending application(s), if any, "shall stand disposed of." The order reflects an exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under constitutional appellate power, with no substantive admission to rehear or interfere with the impugned orders on merits. No respondent counsel appeared. The disposition is limited to refusal to grant special leave to appeal and procedural termination of ancillary applications.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.