DGAP's Rs.3,55,198 ITC differential upheld; respondent paid and passed residual ITC under Section 171(1) CGST

GSTAT, AT affirmed the DGAP's quantified ITC differential of Rs. 3,55,198/- as unchallenged. The respondent voluntarily remitted the amount to the applicant, thereby passing the residual ITC benefit as required under Section 171(1) CGST Act. The tribunal held that antiprofiteering provisions are remedial, and once the benefit is transferred and verified, further proceedings are unnecessary. The DGAP computation is upheld, compliance is complete, and the investigation is concluded with the application disposed of and no further action under the Rules warranted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Respondent has fulfilled its obligation under Section 171(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by passing on the residual Input Tax Credit benefit quantified by the DGAP, thereby warranting closure of the anti-profiteering proceedings.

Analysis: The DGAP re-investigation quantified a residual ITC benefit of Rs. 3,55,198/- to be passed to the beneficiary (IOCL) after accounting for pre-GST credit and discounts already given. The DGAP's computation was received and remained unchallenged on its merits. The Respondent acknowledged the DGAP's quantified differential, prepared a Demand Draft for Rs. 3,55,198/-, and submitted written confirmation of voluntary compliance. The Tribunal examined the DGAP report, the Respondent's submissions, and the objective of Section 171 which aims to ensure passing of tax/ITC benefit to recipients. The Tribunal noted that the anti-profiteering provisions are remedial and consumer-welfare oriented, and that once the identified benefit has been passed to the beneficiary and compliance is verifiable, continuation of proceedings serves no regulatory purpose.

Conclusion: The Respondent has fulfilled its obligations under Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 by transferring the quantified residual ITC benefit to the beneficiary; the DGAP's computation is affirmed and the proceedings are closed in favour of the assessee.

---