Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order of assessment under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is liable to be set aside for non-issuance of the prior notice contemplated under Rule 142(1A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Analysis: The challenge was founded on the absence of a prior notice under Rule 142(1A) before passing the order-in-original. The Court followed its consistent view that non-issuance of such notice vitiates the assessment process.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh completion of assessment after issuance of the necessary notice, in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The impugned assessment did not survive and the proceedings were restored to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute or rules require prior notice before completion of assessment, failure to issue that notice renders the assessment unsustainable and warrants remand for fresh consideration after compliance.