Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment under section 16(3) of the U.P. Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1948, in respect of agricultural income of the year 1359 Fasli could be made against a receiver who was not in management or receipt of the income during that year.
Analysis: The Act fastens the charge on the total agricultural income of the person to whom the income accrues or by whom it is received. Its scheme, including the provisions relating to representative assessees and direct assessment on the beneficial owner, shows that assessment is ordinarily linked to the person who actually received or controlled the income in the relevant previous year. The receiver appointed years later did not manage the estate during 1359 Fasli and did not receive that income. The comparable provisions under the income-tax law support the same principle that liability cannot be shifted to a subsequent receiver merely because he succeeded to the estate.
Conclusion: The assessment could not be made against the receiver, and the question was answered in the negative.
Ratio Decidendi: Under a taxing statute of this scheme, a receiver can be assessed only in respect of income received or entitled to be received by him in the relevant year, and liability cannot be imposed on a later receiver for income received by a prior holder of the estate.