Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether group insurance services (medical) availed by a provider of output service qualify as input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, so as to entitle the service provider to CENVAT credit and refund under Rule 5.
Analysis: The definition of input service under Rule 2(l) contains both a main limb and an inclusive limb. The main limb covers services used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service, and the inclusive limb covers activities relating to business. CENVAT credit under Rule 3 is available where the recipient is a provider of output service, the service qualifies as input service, it is used in providing output service, and service tax has been paid. Group insurance for employees was held to support the provision of output service by enabling employees to work with peace of mind and, in any event, to fall within activities relating to business. The existing authorities, including the earlier decision involving the same assessee, the Karnataka High Court and the Bombay High Court decisions, and the larger bench ruling in TATA Teleservices, all supported this view.
Conclusion: Group insurance services (medical) are input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the service provider is entitled to avail CENVAT credit on the service tax paid thereon.