Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit of service tax paid on mediclaim policy, security at depots, vehicle insurance, car rentals and pest control activities.
Analysis: The denial of credit was based on a construction that confined input service to services used directly in or in relation to manufacture. The Tribunal held that this approach was too narrow and inconsistent with the wider scope of the definition of input service, which extends to services relating to the business activity of the manufacturer. It relied on the Larger Bench view that services having a business nexus, even if not used within the factory premises or directly in manufacture, can qualify for credit when they form part of the cost and business operations of the assessee.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on the disputed services.