Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of service tax paid pursuant to Notification No. 15/2017-ST in view of earlier decisions holding the levy ultra vires.
Analysis: The claim arose from service tax paid on ocean freight under the impugned notification. The same levy had already been held ultra vires in earlier decisions, and the Court treated the present case as governed by those binding rulings. On the admitted and identical facts, no independent ground was made out to deny refund, save for verification of the payment details.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to refund of the service tax already paid pursuant to Notification No. 15/2017-ST, subject to verification of the relevant details.