Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order required interference for want of personal hearing and whether the matter should be sent back for fresh consideration on merits after payment of the balance disputed tax.
Analysis: The impugned assessment was challenged on the ground that it was passed without affording a personal hearing and was said to be contrary to the requirements of natural justice under Section 75 of the GST enactments. The record also showed partial payments already made by the petitioner and the dispute was stated to relate to mismatch of input tax credit. In these circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to direct a fresh decision on merits, with an opportunity of hearing, after deposit of the balance disputed tax.
Conclusion: The matter was directed to be reconsidered by the respondent afresh on merits after the petitioner deposits the balance disputed tax and is given a hearing.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the immediate finality of the assessment and remitting the matter for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment is alleged to have been completed without personal hearing, the Court may direct fresh adjudication on merits with an opportunity of hearing, particularly when the dispute can be reconsidered after the assessee makes the required deposit.