Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of cash deposited during the demonetisation period was sustainable in full, or required restriction having regard to the cash withdrawals and reduction in cash expenses.
Analysis: The cash deposits were claimed to have originated from earlier withdrawals and the assessee furnished cash summaries and reconciliation. The department did not bring any independent evidence to show introduction of undisclosed cash into the books or carry out verification of the utilisation of withdrawals. At the same time, the explanation was not fully acceptable because the assessee could not satisfactorily explain the October withdrawal despite sufficient opening cash, and the reconciliation disclosed a difference in the cash position.
Conclusion: The addition under section 69A was not sustained in full and was restricted to the unexplained difference of Rs. 17,53,484, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.