Confidential tax treaty material may be inspected for investigation where lawful reasons justify limited disclosure.

High Court inspection rules permitted a third party to inspect the judicial record on sufficient reasons, and the Enforcement Directorate, as the investigating agency in a related prosecution, was allowed access to complaint documents for investigation. The treaty confidentiality clause under the India-France double taxation arrangement did not create an absolute bar to limited disclosure for lawful investigative purposes, especially where the material was not sought for public dissemination. The court therefore upheld inspection of the record and access to the information and documents for investigation, while preserving restrictions against unauthorized public release.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Enforcement Directorate could be permitted to inspect the judicial record and documents filed with the complaint, notwithstanding the confidentiality regime under the agreement for avoidance of double taxation with France.

Analysis: The complaint filed by the Income Tax Department contained material received through official channels from the French authorities and placed before the Magistrate in support of prosecution under Section 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and allied IPC provisions. The petitions challenged the orders allowing the Enforcement Directorate to inspect those documents for investigation. The Court noted that the applicable High Court inspection rules expressly permit a stranger to a pending civil or criminal case to inspect the record for sufficient reasons shown to the satisfaction of the Court. The Enforcement Directorate, being an investigative agency concerned with the same subject matter, had sought inspection for the purpose of investigation and the courts below had recorded reasons for allowing access. The Court also held that the treaty confidentiality clause did not bar such limited access for investigation, particularly where the information was not being sought for public dissemination. Reliance on the Supreme Court's treatment of a similar treaty clause supported the view that secrecy is not absolute and that disclosure for judicial or investigative purposes is permissible within lawful limits.

Conclusion: The petitions were dismissed and the Enforcement Directorate was permitted to inspect the record and access the information and documents for investigation, though public dissemination of the material was not permitted unless authorized by law.

---