Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Petition under Article 32 dismissed; challenges to Finance Act 2017, Article 110 money-bill claim and Section 184 rejected</h1> <h3>M/s. Primus Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus Union Of India & Ors.</h3> M/s. Primus Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus Union Of India & Ors. - TMi 'We are not inclined to entertain this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India; the writ petition is dismissed.' The Court dismissed the Article 32 petition but noted that similar issues are pending in Civil Appeal No. 8588 of 2019 before a Constitution Bench. It held that the petitioner(s) may 'intervene in such proceedings' or 'invoke writ remedy before the jurisdictional High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, if so advised.' Pending application(s), if any, were directed to 'stand disposed of.' The Order therefore denies relief under Article 32, preserves the petitioner's right to pursue remedies either by intervention in the ongoing Civil Appeal before the Constitution Bench or by seeking relief under Article 226 in the High Court, and disposes of ancillary applications.