Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under the GST enactments required interference and remand for fresh consideration in view of the petitioner's prior tax payment and the failure to consider the same.
Analysis: The impugned order was passed under Section 73 after a notice in Form DRC-01, but the petitioner had sought time and had also made a prior payment towards CGST and SGST in GSTR-9, which was not taken into account. The petitioner had not filed a substantive reply or appeared for hearing, yet the omission to consider the admitted prior payment warranted a limited interference. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration, with directions to file a detailed reply and make a partial deposit within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits, subject to compliance with the directed conditions.