Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an addition made in processing of return under section 143(1)(a)(v) could be sustained where the assessee had returned income under the presumptive scheme under section 44ADA.
Analysis: The assessee had filed the return under the presumptive scheme under section 44ADA, which deems profits at 50% of gross receipts under section 44ADA(1). The addition of remuneration received from the LLP was not found sustainable in view of the returned income declared under the presumptive scheme, and the Revenue did not rebut this factual position.
Conclusion: The addition made in the processing under section 143(1)(a)(v) was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.