Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST demand and rectification-related orders were liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on the petitioner's claim of exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
Analysis: The record indicated a mismatch between the auto-populated returns and the petitioner's filed returns, while the petitioner asserted that the services were rendered only to Government departments and were exempt. As the appellate authority had already allowed the petitioner's appeals for the identical period and the petitioner was asked to produce supporting documents, the matter required reconsideration on the basis of proper proof of exemption. The rectification request under Section 161 was also noted to have been made beyond limitation.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to produce supporting documents.