TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1. Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 29.07.2022 is valid, considering the timelines prescribed under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) and subsequent judicial pronouncements.
2. Whether the notice dated 30.06.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Act during the TOLA period is valid, given the procedural requirements and limitations imposed by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.
3. Interpretation and application of the Supreme Court's directions in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal and Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal concerning the issuance, limitation, and procedural safeguards related to reassessment notices under the Income Tax Act read with TOLA.
4. Whether the assessing officer complied with the procedural requirements under Section 148A(b), 148A(d), and Section 149 read with TOLA for reopening assessments and issuing reassessment notices.
5. The effect of the time limits prescribed under TOLA and the Income Tax Act on the validity of reassessment notices issued between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 and subsequently.
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSISIssue 1 & 2: Validity of the reassessment notices dated 29.07.2022 and 30.06.2021 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act read with TOLA and Supreme Court rulings
Legal Framework and Precedents:
- Section 148 of the Income Tax Act empowers the assessing officer to reopen an assessment if income has escaped assessment.
- TOLA was enacted to provide relief by relaxing limitation periods and procedural timelines during the COVID-19 pandemic, extending deadlines for issuance of reassessment notices and approvals.
- The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal created a legal fiction deeming notices issued under the old regime as show cause notices under Section 148A(b) of the new regime, balancing equities between Revenue and assessees, and prescribing procedural safeguards including supply of relevant material and opportunity to reply.
- The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal clarified modalities for issuance of reassessment notices under TOLA, prescribing strict timelines for issuance of notices and granting of approvals, and held that any notice issued beyond the surviving time limit is time-barred and invalid.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning:
- The Court noted that the notice dated 30.06.2021 was issued during the TOLA period when only limited time was available for issuance of reassessment notices after giving the assessee opportunity to reply to the show cause notice issued under Section 148A(b).
- Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Rajeev Bansal, the Court observed that the last date for issuance of a valid reassessment notice under Section 148 would be 17.06.2022 after allowing 14 days for the assessee to respond to the Section 148A(b) notice issued on 21.05.2022 (per Ashish Agarwal directions).
- The impugned notice dated 29.07.2022 was issued well beyond this timeline, thus rendering it time-barred and invalid.
- Consequently, the notice dated 30.06.2021, which relates to the impugned notice, was also held to be invalid for non-compliance with the prescribed timelines and procedural safeguards.
Key Evidence and Findings:
- The petitioner filed the return of income for AY 2013-14 on 08.07.2014.
- Notice under Section 148 dated 17.06.2021 was issued during the TOLA period.
- Notice under Section 148A(b) was issued on 26.05.2022 following the Supreme Court's Ashish Agarwal decision.
- Order under Section 148A(d) dated 29.07.2022 proposed reopening of assessment alleging escaped income of Rs. 74,97,625/-.
- Notice under Section 148 dated 29.07.2022 was issued subsequent to the order under Section 148A(d).
- The Supreme Court's Rajeev Bansal ruling was placed on record during pendency, which prescribed that the reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued within the surviving time limit after the assessee's reply.
- Learned Senior Standing Counsel did not dispute the timelines and validity issues raised based on the Supreme Court's rulings.
Application of Law to Facts:
- The Court applied the Supreme Court's directions in Rajeev Bansal and Ashish Agarwal to the facts, calculating the surviving time limit for issuance of reassessment notice under Section 148 as 17.06.2022.
- Since the impugned notice was issued on 29.07.2022, it was beyond the surviving time limit and therefore invalid.
- The notice dated 30.06.2021 was also invalid as it did not comply with the prescribed procedural safeguards and timelines.
Treatment of Competing Arguments:
- The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court's rulings to argue invalidity of the notices.
- The Revenue did not contest the applicability of the Supreme Court's rulings or the timelines prescribed therein.
Conclusions:
- Both the notice dated 30.06.2021 and the impugned notice dated 29.07.2022 are invalid and time-barred.
- The reassessment proceedings initiated on the basis of these notices are quashed and set aside.
Issue 3 & 5: Interpretation and effect of Supreme Court directions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal on reassessment notices issued under TOLA
Legal Framework and Precedents:
- The Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal held that reassessment notices issued under the old regime between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 are to be treated as show cause notices under the new regime's Section 148A(b).
- The Court mandated supply of relevant material to assessees and allowed them to respond with all available defenses including limitation under Section 149.
- Rajeev Bansal clarified that the limitation period was effectively frozen during the period from issuance of deemed notices till receipt of relevant material and further allowed time for reply, after which the assessing officer must issue reassessment notices within the surviving time limit.
- The surviving time limit for issuance of reassessment notices under the new regime read with TOLA is strictly to be adhered to; failure to comply renders the notice invalid.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning:
- The Court emphasized that TOLA overrides Section 149 of the Income Tax Act only to the extent of relaxing timelines for issuance of reassessment notices.
- The Court reiterated that the extension of time granted under TOLA applies to the grant of sanction by the authority under Section 151 as well.
- The Court accepted the Supreme Court's conclusion that all reassessment notices issued beyond the surviving time limit under the Income Tax Act read with TOLA are liable to be quashed.
Key Evidence and Findings:
- The Supreme Court's detailed explanation in paragraphs 92, 93, and 110-114 of Rajeev Bansal was relied upon to establish the procedural and temporal framework.
- The Court noted that the time during which show cause notices were deemed stayed includes the period from issuance of deemed notices till supply of relevant material plus 14 days for response.
Application of Law to Facts:
- The Court applied the above framework to the reassessment notices in question, finding non-compliance with the surviving time limit.
Treatment of Competing Arguments:
- No contrary submissions were advanced disputing the applicability of these directions.
Conclusions:
- The Supreme Court's directions form the binding procedural and temporal framework for reassessment notices issued under TOLA.
- Notices issued beyond the surviving time limit are invalid and liable to be quashed.
Issue 4: Compliance with procedural requirements under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d), and Section 149 read with TOLA
Legal Framework and Precedents:
- Section 148A(b) requires the assessing officer to issue a show cause notice with relevant material before reopening assessment.
- Section 148A(d) requires the assessing officer to record reasons and pass an order on whether income has escaped assessment.
- Section 149 prescribes limitation periods for issuance of reassessment notices.
- TOLA modifies limitation periods and procedural timelines during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning:
- The Court observed that the assessing officer issued the Section 148A(b) notice on 26.05.2022 and passed the order under Section 148A(d) on 29.07.2022.
- However, the subsequent issuance of the reassessment notice under Section 148 on 29.07.2022 was beyond the surviving time limit prescribed under the combined reading of the Act and TOLA as clarified by the Supreme Court.
- The Court found that compliance with procedural requirements alone is insufficient if the notice is issued beyond the surviving time limit.
Key Evidence and Findings:
- The dates of issuance of notices and orders under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d), and 148 were established from the record.
Application of Law to Facts:
- Although the procedural steps under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) were followed, the ultimate issuance of the notice under Section 148 was invalid due to time bar.
Treatment of Competing Arguments:
- The petitioner emphasized the importance of adhering to limitation periods despite procedural compliance.
- The Revenue did not contest the time bar issue.
Conclusions:
- Procedural compliance under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) does not cure the defect of issuing the reassessment notice beyond the surviving time limit.
- The reassessment notice dated 29.07.2022 is invalid on this ground.
TaxTMI 
