Reassessment validity and unexplained income addition sustained where reopening had tangible material and credit entry lacked genuineness.

ITAT Delhi upheld reassessment where reopening was backed by tangible material and the approval record showed application of mind under section 151, so the challenge to validity failed. It also sustained the addition for unexplained income because the assessee received funds from an accommodation entry provider, the notice to that entity went unanswered, and the assessee did not prove genuineness or creditworthiness. On those facts, the adverse inference was justified and the assessed income remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the reassessment proceedings were invalid for want of recorded reasons and approval under section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the addition of Rs. 25 lakhs as unexplained income was justified.

Issue (i): Whether the reassessment proceedings were invalid for want of recorded reasons and approval under section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The reopening was supported by tangible material, and the approval record showed application of mind by the prescribed authority. The challenge to the validity of reassessment was therefore not accepted.

Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were held to be valid, against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the addition of Rs. 25 lakhs as unexplained income was justified.

Analysis: The amount was received from an entity treated as an accommodation entry provider, the notice issued to that entity remained unanswered, and the assessee failed to establish genuineness and creditworthiness. The surrounding material justified the adverse inference and the addition.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 25 lakhs was sustained, against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on both the validity of reopening and the merits of the addition, leaving the assessed income undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where reassessment is supported by tangible material and proper approval, and the assessee fails to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of a credit entry, the reopening and resulting addition can be sustained.

---