ITAT Allows Reconsideration of Income Addition Under Section on Bogus Purchases, Orders Recalculation

The ITAT Mumbai-AT allowed the assessee's miscellaneous application, finding that the Tribunal failed to adjudicate specific grounds raised by the assessee, resulting in a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal's order dated 05-10-2018 was recalled. Regarding the estimation of income on alleged bogus purchases, the ITAT held that the addition should be limited to the difference between the gross profit on alleged bogus purchases and that on undisputed purchases, following the Bombay HC decision in Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the AO for recomputation of the addition in line with the HC ruling.

---

---

ISSUES:

Whether the reopening of assessment was valid.Whether the addition of 12.5% of the value of alleged bogus purchases is justified.Whether the addition should be restricted to the difference between the Gross Profit (GP) on alleged bogus purchases and the GP on undisputed purchases when the GP rate on alleged bogus purchases is less than that on genuine purchases.Whether non-adjudication of specific grounds raised by the assessee amounts to a mistake apparent from record justifying recall of the Tribunal's order.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

The Tribunal's order dated 05-10-2018 was recalled because the "non-disposal of specific grounds urged by the assessee results in mistakes apparent from the record."The addition made by the Ld CIT(A) at the rate of 12.5% of the value of alleged bogus purchases was not in accordance with the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's ruling and thus was set aside.The addition should be computed "in accordance with the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court" which restricts the addition to the difference between the GP on alleged bogus purchases and the GP on undisputed purchases if the GP rate on alleged bogus purchases is less.The issue relating to validity of reopening of assessment was not pressed and thus not adjudicated in the present order.The Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal was partly allowed accordingly.

RATIONALE:

The legal framework applied includes the principle established by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in PCIT vs. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co., which mandates that additions in cases of alleged bogus purchases be limited to the difference in gross profits rather than an arbitrary percentage of purchase value.The Tribunal found that the failure to adjudicate the specific grounds raised by the assessee constituted a "mistake apparent from record," necessitating recall of its prior order to ensure comprehensive adjudication.The decision reflects adherence to precedent and correct application of the principle that additions must be proportionate and based on profit differentials rather than fixed percentages.No dissent or doctrinal shift was indicated in the judgment.

---