Travertine slabs eligible for concessional duty under Notification 12/2012 as calcareous stone variety like marble /2012

CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal regarding eligibility of travertine slabs for concessional duty under Notification 12/2012. The Revenue denied exemption arguing that the notification covered only "marble slabs and tiles" while travertine differed from marble. The Tribunal held that travertine is a variety of calcareous stone like marble, with marble being the genus and travertine the species. Under Chapter sub-heading 6802, travertine falls under CTH 68022190 which was specifically included in Notification 12/2012 after trade representations. Since the Department did not dispute the classification of travertine under CTH 68022190, denial of notification benefits was unjustified. The Tribunal found no merit in the Commissioner's observations and set aside the impugned orders, granting the appellant the benefit of concessional additional customs duty.

---

---

ISSUES:

Whether the imported goods described as "Honed/Semi Polished Marble Slabs – Travertino Titanium – Silver Beige Colour" classified under CTH 68022190 are eligible for concessional rate of Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) benefit under Sl. No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.03.2012.Whether 'Travertine' is a distinct category from 'marble' for the purposes of Customs Tariff classification and exemption notifications.Whether the benefit of concessional rate under Notification No. 12/2012-CE can be denied on the ground that the goods are 'Travertine' and not 'marble slabs and tiles' as described in the notification.Whether extended period of limitation, confiscation, and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962 are sustainable in the absence of wilful mis-declaration or suppression of facts.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

The imported goods classified under CTH 68022190 as "Marble slabs (Honed/Semi Polished) Travertine Ext Beige Colour" are eligible for the concessional rate of CVD benefit under Sl. No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.03.2012, as "Travertine" is a variety of marble and falls within the scope of the description "marble slabs and tiles."'Travertine' is recognized as a species within the genus 'marble' based on the HSN explanatory notes and authoritative mineralogical definitions, and thus is covered under the tariff heading 68022190 included in the notification.The denial of benefit on the basis that the goods are 'Travertine' and not 'marble slabs and tiles' is unsustainable, particularly given that the Department does not dispute classification under CTH 68022190 and the TRU clarification letter dated 16.03.2012 supports inclusion of heading 68022190 for concessional benefit.There is no sufficient evidence of wilful mis-declaration or suppression of facts to invoke extended period of limitation, confiscation under Section 111(m), or penalties under Sections 114A, 114AA, and 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962; hence, such penalties and confiscation are not sustainable.

RATIONALE:

The Court applied a combined interpretation of Notification No. 4/2006-CE and Notification No. 12/2012-CE, noting that the latter specifically inserted tariff heading 68022190 to extend concessional benefit to polished marble slabs previously not covered.The Court relied on the Harmonized System Nomenclature (HSN) explanatory notes which describe marble as a hard calcareous stone capable of taking polish and identify Travertine as a variety of calcareous stone within the marble family.Authoritative mineralogical sources including the Indian Minerals Yearbook 2013 were considered, which define marble as a genus and Travertine as a species thereof, capable of taking polish and commercially treated as marble.The Court gave weight to the Trade and Revenue Unit (TRU) letter dated 16.03.2012 clarifying that exemption applies to goods covered by the description and tariff headings, including 68022190, thereby supporting a purposive and non-restrictive interpretation of the exemption notification.The Court rejected the Revenue's strict literal interpretation that excludes Travertine, emphasizing that the description "marble slabs and tiles" encompasses varieties like Travertine which are commercially recognized as marble.The Court noted precedents emphasizing that exemption notifications should be interpreted in favor of the assessee where the goods fall within the description and classification, and that the burden of proving ineligibility rests on the Revenue.Penalties and confiscation require proof of wilful mis-declaration or suppression, which was not established; hence, extended period of limitation and penalties were disallowed.

---